iGaming Tools — independent slot, provider & regulator reference data vs iota-mcp
Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.
MetriciGaming Tools — independent slot, provider & regulator reference dataMCP Serveriota-mcpMCP Server
- Type
- iGaming Tools — independent slot, provider & regulator reference dataMCP Server
- iota-mcpMCP Server
- Category
- iGaming Tools — independent slot, provider & regulator reference dataOther
- iota-mcpOther
- GitHub stars
- iGaming Tools — independent slot, provider & regulator reference data0
- iota-mcp0
- Trust score
- iGaming Tools — independent slot, provider & regulator reference dataNot yet assessed
- iota-mcp74/100 · Good
- Community rating
- iGaming Tools — independent slot, provider & regulator reference dataNo reviews yet
- iota-mcpNo reviews yet
- Last commit
- iGaming Tools — independent slot, provider & regulator reference dataUnknown
- iota-mcp76 days ago
- Licence
- iGaming Tools — independent slot, provider & regulator reference dataNone declared
- iota-mcpNOASSERTION
- Official
- iGaming Tools — independent slot, provider & regulator reference dataNo
- iota-mcpNo
- Source
- iGaming Tools — independent slot, provider & regulator reference dataNot available
- iota-mcp Repository
Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.