Hyperliquid Market Data — OHLCV, Funding Rates & Positioning (Tessera) vs audit-ledger-mcp
Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.
MetricHyperliquid Market Data — OHLCV, Funding Rates & Positioning (Tessera)MCP Serveraudit-ledger-mcpMCP Server
- Type
- Hyperliquid Market Data — OHLCV, Funding Rates & Positioning (Tessera)MCP Server
- audit-ledger-mcpMCP Server
- Category
- Hyperliquid Market Data — OHLCV, Funding Rates & Positioning (Tessera)Finance
- audit-ledger-mcpFinance
- GitHub stars
- Hyperliquid Market Data — OHLCV, Funding Rates & Positioning (Tessera)0
- audit-ledger-mcp0
- Trust score
- Hyperliquid Market Data — OHLCV, Funding Rates & Positioning (Tessera)Not yet assessed
- audit-ledger-mcpNot yet assessed
- Community rating
- Hyperliquid Market Data — OHLCV, Funding Rates & Positioning (Tessera)No reviews yet
- audit-ledger-mcpNo reviews yet
- Last commit
- Hyperliquid Market Data — OHLCV, Funding Rates & Positioning (Tessera)Unknown
- audit-ledger-mcpUnknown
- Licence
- Hyperliquid Market Data — OHLCV, Funding Rates & Positioning (Tessera)None declared
- audit-ledger-mcpNone declared
- Official
- Hyperliquid Market Data — OHLCV, Funding Rates & Positioning (Tessera)No
- audit-ledger-mcpNo
- Source
- Hyperliquid Market Data — OHLCV, Funding Rates & Positioning (Tessera)Not available
- audit-ledger-mcp Repository
Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.