HORIZON SHIELD WebMCP Intake vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricHORIZON SHIELD WebMCP IntakeMCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: HORIZON SHIELD WebMCP IntakeMCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: HORIZON SHIELD WebMCP IntakeOther; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: HORIZON SHIELD WebMCP Intake0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: HORIZON SHIELD WebMCP IntakeNot yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: HORIZON SHIELD WebMCP IntakeNo reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: HORIZON SHIELD WebMCP IntakeUnknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: HORIZON SHIELD WebMCP IntakeNone declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: HORIZON SHIELD WebMCP IntakeNo; iota-mcpNo
Source: HORIZON SHIELD WebMCP Intake Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.