HeyClaude — Claude & AI workflow directory vs Roster

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricHeyClaude — Claude & AI workflow directoryMCP Server RosterMCP Server

Type: HeyClaude — Claude & AI workflow directoryMCP Server; RosterMCP Server
Category: HeyClaude — Claude & AI workflow directoryAutomation; RosterAutomation
GitHub stars: HeyClaude — Claude & AI workflow directory0; Roster0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: HeyClaude — Claude & AI workflow directoryNot yet assessed; RosterNot yet assessed
Community rating: HeyClaude — Claude & AI workflow directoryNo reviews yet; RosterNo reviews yet
Last commit: HeyClaude — Claude & AI workflow directoryUnknown; RosterUnknown
Licence: HeyClaude — Claude & AI workflow directoryNone declared; RosterNone declared
Official: HeyClaude — Claude & AI workflow directoryNo; RosterNo
Source: HeyClaude — Claude & AI workflow directory Repository; RosterNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.