Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis vs tiger-skills

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricGrasp — Code Architecture & Dependency AnalysisMCP Server tiger-skillsMCP Server

Type: Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency AnalysisMCP Server; tiger-skillsMCP Server
Category: Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency AnalysisVersion Control; tiger-skillsVersion Control
GitHub stars: Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis0; tiger-skills0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency AnalysisNot yet assessed; tiger-skillsNot yet assessed
Community rating: Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency AnalysisNo reviews yet; tiger-skillsNo reviews yet
Last commit: Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency AnalysisUnknown; tiger-skillsUnknown
Licence: Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency AnalysisNone declared; tiger-skillsNone declared
Official: Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency AnalysisNo; tiger-skillsNo
Source: Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis Repository; tiger-skills Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.