Google Scholar vs fci-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricGoogle ScholarMCP Server fci-mcpMCP Server

Type: Google ScholarMCP Server; fci-mcpMCP Server
Category: Google ScholarScience; fci-mcpScience
GitHub stars: Google Scholar0; fci-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Google ScholarNot yet assessed; fci-mcpNot yet assessed
Community rating: Google ScholarNo reviews yet; fci-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: Google ScholarUnknown; fci-mcpUnknown
Licence: Google ScholarNone declared; fci-mcpNone declared
Official: Google ScholarNo; fci-mcpNo
Source: Google Scholar Repository; fci-mcpNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.