Distro Publisher (beta) vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricDistro Publisher (beta)MCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: Distro Publisher (beta)MCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: Distro Publisher (beta)Other; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: Distro Publisher (beta)0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Distro Publisher (beta)Not yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: Distro Publisher (beta)No reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: Distro Publisher (beta)Unknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: Distro Publisher (beta)None declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: Distro Publisher (beta)No; iota-mcpNo
Source: Distro Publisher (beta)Not available; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.