Philidor DeFi Vault Risk Analytics vs SQD Portal

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricPhilidor DeFi Vault Risk AnalyticsMCP Server SQD PortalMCP Server

Type: Philidor DeFi Vault Risk AnalyticsMCP Server; SQD PortalMCP Server
Category: Philidor DeFi Vault Risk AnalyticsCrypto; SQD PortalCrypto
GitHub stars: Philidor DeFi Vault Risk Analytics0; SQD Portal1
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Philidor DeFi Vault Risk AnalyticsNot yet assessed; SQD Portal79/100 · Good
Community rating: Philidor DeFi Vault Risk AnalyticsNo reviews yet; SQD PortalNo reviews yet
Last commit: Philidor DeFi Vault Risk AnalyticsUnknown; SQD Portal15 days ago
Licence: Philidor DeFi Vault Risk AnalyticsNone declared; SQD PortalMIT
Official: Philidor DeFi Vault Risk AnalyticsNo; SQD PortalNo
Source: Philidor DeFi Vault Risk Analytics Repository; SQD Portal Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.