DeadCat: Reaper vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricDeadCat: ReaperMCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: DeadCat: ReaperMCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: DeadCat: ReaperOther; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: DeadCat: Reaper0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: DeadCat: ReaperNot yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: DeadCat: ReaperNo reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: DeadCat: ReaperUnknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: DeadCat: ReaperNone declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: DeadCat: ReaperNo; iota-mcpNo
Source: DeadCat: Reaper Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.