Crossref Scholarly Data vs SRG+

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricCrossref Scholarly DataMCP Server SRG+MCP Server

Type: Crossref Scholarly DataMCP Server; SRG+MCP Server
Category: Crossref Scholarly DataProductivity; SRG+Productivity
GitHub stars: Crossref Scholarly Data0; SRG+0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Crossref Scholarly DataNot yet assessed; SRG+Not yet assessed
Community rating: Crossref Scholarly DataNo reviews yet; SRG+No reviews yet
Last commit: Crossref Scholarly DataUnknown; SRG+Unknown
Licence: Crossref Scholarly DataNone declared; SRG+None declared
Official: Crossref Scholarly DataNo; SRG+No
Source: Crossref Scholarly Data Repository; SRG+ Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.