Crossref Scholarly Data vs smithery-notion

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricCrossref Scholarly DataMCP Server smithery-notionMCP Server

Type: Crossref Scholarly DataMCP Server; smithery-notionMCP Server
Category: Crossref Scholarly DataProductivity; smithery-notionProductivity
GitHub stars: Crossref Scholarly Data0; smithery-notion0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Crossref Scholarly DataNot yet assessed; smithery-notionNot yet assessed
Community rating: Crossref Scholarly DataNo reviews yet; smithery-notionNo reviews yet
Last commit: Crossref Scholarly DataUnknown; smithery-notionUnknown
Licence: Crossref Scholarly DataNone declared; smithery-notionNone declared
Official: Crossref Scholarly DataNo; smithery-notionNo
Source: Crossref Scholarly Data Repository; smithery-notion Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.