cosync-local vs AI Security Gateway — MCP Gateway

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metriccosync-localMCP Server AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayMCP Server

Type: cosync-localMCP Server; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayMCP Server
Category: cosync-localSecurity; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewaySecurity
GitHub stars: cosync-local0; AI Security Gateway — MCP Gateway0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: cosync-localNot yet assessed; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayNot yet assessed
Community rating: cosync-localNo reviews yet; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayNo reviews yet
Last commit: cosync-localUnknown; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayUnknown
Licence: cosync-localNone declared; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayNone declared
Official: cosync-localNo; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayNo
Source: cosync-local Repository; AI Security Gateway — MCP GatewayNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.