Cordon for MCP vs cobbles

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricCordon for MCPMCP Server cobblesMCP Server

Type: Cordon for MCPMCP Server; cobblesMCP Server
Category: Cordon for MCPSecurity; cobblesSecurity
GitHub stars: Cordon for MCP0; cobbles0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Cordon for MCPNot yet assessed; cobblesNot yet assessed
Community rating: Cordon for MCPNo reviews yet; cobblesNo reviews yet
Last commit: Cordon for MCPUnknown; cobblesUnknown
Licence: Cordon for MCPNone declared; cobblesNone declared
Official: Cordon for MCPNo; cobblesNo
Source: Cordon for MCP Repository; cobbles Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.