Context Keeper (remote) vs files-com

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricContext Keeper (remote)MCP Server files-comMCP Server

Type: Context Keeper (remote)MCP Server; files-comMCP Server
Category: Context Keeper (remote)Cloud; files-comCloud
GitHub stars: Context Keeper (remote)0; files-com0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Context Keeper (remote)Not yet assessed; files-comNot yet assessed
Community rating: Context Keeper (remote)No reviews yet; files-comNo reviews yet
Last commit: Context Keeper (remote)Unknown; files-comUnknown
Licence: Context Keeper (remote)None declared; files-comNone declared
Official: Context Keeper (remote)No; files-comNo
Source: Context Keeper (remote) Repository; files-com Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.