Conduct AI vs Roster

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricConduct AIMCP Server RosterMCP Server

Type: Conduct AIMCP Server; RosterMCP Server
Category: Conduct AIAutomation; RosterAutomation
GitHub stars: Conduct AI0; Roster0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Conduct AINot yet assessed; RosterNot yet assessed
Community rating: Conduct AINo reviews yet; RosterNo reviews yet
Last commit: Conduct AIUnknown; RosterUnknown
Licence: Conduct AINone declared; RosterNone declared
Official: Conduct AINo; RosterNo
Source: Conduct AI Repository; RosterNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.