three.ws Concierge vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricthree.ws ConciergeMCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: three.ws ConciergeMCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: three.ws ConciergeOther; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: three.ws Concierge0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: three.ws ConciergeNot yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: three.ws ConciergeNo reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: three.ws ConciergeUnknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: three.ws ConciergeNone declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: three.ws ConciergeNo; iota-mcpNo
Source: three.ws Concierge Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.