Runbook Example Catalog vs uselessfacts

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricRunbook Example CatalogMCP Server uselessfactsMCP Server

Type: Runbook Example CatalogMCP Server; uselessfactsMCP Server
Category: Runbook Example CatalogOther; uselessfactsOther
GitHub stars: Runbook Example Catalog0; uselessfacts0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Runbook Example CatalogNot yet assessed; uselessfacts74/100 · Good
Community rating: Runbook Example CatalogNo reviews yet; uselessfactsNo reviews yet
Last commit: Runbook Example CatalogUnknown; uselessfacts58 days ago
Licence: Runbook Example CatalogNone declared; uselessfactsMIT
Official: Runbook Example CatalogNo; uselessfactsNo
Source: Runbook Example CatalogNot available; uselessfacts Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.