CarryFeed vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricCarryFeedMCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: CarryFeedMCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: CarryFeedOther; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: CarryFeed0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: CarryFeedNot yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: CarryFeedNo reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: CarryFeedUnknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: CarryFeedNone declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: CarryFeedNo; iota-mcpNo
Source: CarryFeed Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.