NetGrant — Canadian funding vs Recite MCP

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricNetGrant — Canadian fundingMCP Server Recite MCPMCP Server

Type: NetGrant — Canadian fundingMCP Server; Recite MCPMCP Server
Category: NetGrant — Canadian fundingFinance; Recite MCPFinance
GitHub stars: NetGrant — Canadian funding0; Recite MCP0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: NetGrant — Canadian fundingNot yet assessed; Recite MCPNot yet assessed
Community rating: NetGrant — Canadian fundingNo reviews yet; Recite MCPNo reviews yet
Last commit: NetGrant — Canadian fundingUnknown; Recite MCPUnknown
Licence: NetGrant — Canadian fundingNone declared; Recite MCPNone declared
Official: NetGrant — Canadian fundingNo; Recite MCPNo
Source: NetGrant — Canadian funding Repository; Recite MCP Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.