buying-committee vs card-provisioning

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricbuying-committeeSkill card-provisioningSkill

Type: buying-committeeSkill; card-provisioningSkill
Category: buying-committeeFinance; card-provisioningFinance
GitHub stars: buying-committee0; card-provisioning0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: buying-committeeNot yet assessed; card-provisioningNot yet assessed
Community rating: buying-committeeNo reviews yet; card-provisioningNo reviews yet
Last commit: buying-committeeUnknown; card-provisioningUnknown
Licence: buying-committeeNone declared; card-provisioningNone declared
Official: buying-committeeNo; card-provisioningNo
Source: buying-committee Repository; card-provisioning Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.