BuilderVet — NSW builder licence & risk history vs iota-mcp

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricBuilderVet — NSW builder licence & risk historyMCP Server iota-mcpMCP Server

Type: BuilderVet — NSW builder licence & risk historyMCP Server; iota-mcpMCP Server
Category: BuilderVet — NSW builder licence & risk historyOther; iota-mcpOther
GitHub stars: BuilderVet — NSW builder licence & risk history0; iota-mcp0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: BuilderVet — NSW builder licence & risk historyNot yet assessed; iota-mcp74/100 · Good
Community rating: BuilderVet — NSW builder licence & risk historyNo reviews yet; iota-mcpNo reviews yet
Last commit: BuilderVet — NSW builder licence & risk historyUnknown; iota-mcp76 days ago
Licence: BuilderVet — NSW builder licence & risk historyNone declared; iota-mcpNOASSERTION
Official: BuilderVet — NSW builder licence & risk historyNo; iota-mcpNo
Source: BuilderVet — NSW builder licence & risk history Repository; iota-mcp Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.