Backstory: search your data exports locally vs llamanotes

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricBackstory: search your data exports locallyMCP Server llamanotesMCP Server

Type: Backstory: search your data exports locallyMCP Server; llamanotesMCP Server
Category: Backstory: search your data exports locallyCommunication; llamanotesCommunication
GitHub stars: Backstory: search your data exports locally0; llamanotes0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Backstory: search your data exports locallyNot yet assessed; llamanotesNot yet assessed
Community rating: Backstory: search your data exports locallyNo reviews yet; llamanotesNo reviews yet
Last commit: Backstory: search your data exports locallyUnknown; llamanotesUnknown
Licence: Backstory: search your data exports locallyNone declared; llamanotesNone declared
Official: Backstory: search your data exports locallyNo; llamanotesNo
Source: Backstory: search your data exports locally Repository; llamanotesNot available

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.