AWS MCP Servers vs files-com

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricAWS MCP ServersMCP Server files-comMCP Server

Type: AWS MCP ServersMCP Server; files-comMCP Server
Category: AWS MCP ServersCloud; files-comCloud
GitHub stars: AWS MCP Servers9.5K; files-com0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: AWS MCP Servers97/100 · Excellent; files-comNot yet assessed
Community rating: AWS MCP ServersNo reviews yet; files-comNo reviews yet
Last commit: AWS MCP Servers3 days ago; files-comUnknown
Licence: AWS MCP ServersApache-2.0; files-comNone declared
Official: AWS MCP Servers Yes; files-comNo
Source: AWS MCP Servers Repository; files-com Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.