agent-arbitration vs Agentic Terminal Directory

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

Metricagent-arbitrationMCP Server Agentic Terminal DirectoryMCP Server

Type: agent-arbitrationMCP Server; Agentic Terminal DirectoryMCP Server
Category: agent-arbitrationPayments; Agentic Terminal DirectoryPayments
GitHub stars: agent-arbitration0; Agentic Terminal Directory0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: agent-arbitrationNot yet assessed; Agentic Terminal Directory79/100 · Good
Community rating: agent-arbitrationNo reviews yet; Agentic Terminal DirectoryNo reviews yet
Last commit: agent-arbitrationUnknown; Agentic Terminal Directory5 days ago
Licence: agent-arbitrationNone declared; Agentic Terminal DirectoryMIT
Official: agent-arbitrationNo; Agentic Terminal DirectoryNo
Source: agent-arbitration Repository; Agentic Terminal Directory Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.