Acta — Verifiable Agent Memory vs Recite MCP

Side by side on the facts. GitHub figures come straight from each repository; ratings come from signed-in reviewers here.

MetricActa — Verifiable Agent MemoryMCP Server Recite MCPMCP Server

Type: Acta — Verifiable Agent MemoryMCP Server; Recite MCPMCP Server
Category: Acta — Verifiable Agent MemoryFinance; Recite MCPFinance
GitHub stars: Acta — Verifiable Agent Memory0; Recite MCP0
Trust scoreⓘAuditability and maintenance signals — not a security audit.: Acta — Verifiable Agent MemoryNot yet assessed; Recite MCPNot yet assessed
Community rating: Acta — Verifiable Agent MemoryNo reviews yet; Recite MCPNo reviews yet
Last commit: Acta — Verifiable Agent MemoryUnknown; Recite MCPUnknown
Licence: Acta — Verifiable Agent MemoryNone declared; Recite MCPNone declared
Official: Acta — Verifiable Agent MemoryNo; Recite MCPNo
Source: Acta — Verifiable Agent Memory Repository; Recite MCP Repository

Highlighted cells win that row on an objective measure. Rows without a clear winner — category, licence, source — are left unmarked. A higher trust score means better auditability and maintenance, not safer code.